Energy autonomy
(Industry Revolution 4.0)
The main winner will be the environment, women, children and thus all of civilization.
---------------------------
Alt's view: "Better to risk climate change and its consequences than to restructure trade forms and routes."
NEW view: "Better to prevent a climate catastrophe and to restructure the forms of trade and routes."
---------------------------
Industrialized countries like Germany, communities like the EU are now able to produce the energy they need themselves. The necessary technologies are tried and tested and reliable, including the production, storage and transport of hydrogen. The conversion and renewal of energy consumers such as: cars, trucks, trains, ships and heating systems is initiated. The energy change from fossil fuels such as coal, crude oil and natural gas to renewable energies such as hydrogen enables complete independence from other energy suppliers.
---------------------------
Positive effects are a significant reduction in secondary diseases of environmental pollution. Global warming will be contained, stopped? can at least be slowed down. An exchange of technology with other countries and third world countries creates new trade relations. Negative effects are that trade with countries that cover their national income mainly through the sale of natural gas and oil will almost be stopped without replacement trade.
---------------------------
The consequences of energy autonomy are perceived differently. As in any of the previous industrial revolutions, the transition to a new form of industry will not go smoothly. Governments and companies will have to compensate for many changes, and public resentment will change the power structures in some countries.
---------------------------
Dependencies on dictators, male dominance and multinational companies are decreasing.
-------------------------------
Daring mindset
Imagine the following:
There are no Chinese, no Americans, no Saxons, no Hamburgers. There are no women, no men, no Jews, Christians, Muslims, pagans, thin people, tall people. There are no young and no old people. There are no nobles, no reds, no whites and no black people. No Miller, Smith, Won, or Paul.
There are only people and they
Superficially divided into 3 groups.
1.) The good and loved ones. 2.) The indifferent. 3.) The selfish and vicious.
A person divides himself. In the 1st), 2nd) or 3rd) group.
Which group do you belong to?
In which group would you feel most comfortable?
Would you also change the group and if so to which group?
Where do you feel your relatives, friends, neighbors or work colleagues, etc. belong to?
Result
You meet or you hear from people and it's you
not important to know
what gender, what name, height, disabilities, parentage, education,
etc. he-she-has-have-it.
But you are fine
important to learn
whether you have a loved one in front of you or a selfish vicious.
Evaluation of
Social systems
From the point of view of those directly affected as well as from the point of view of outsiders:
To what extent is correct behavior or possible incorrect behavior perceived in different life situations.
12 Criteria: How is it handled ...
1. with babies and children?
2. with women and mothers?
3. with sick and handicapped people?
4. With victims of violence and accidents as well as those seeking help?
5. with waste and feces?
6. with corruption?
7. With vital ingredients in food?
8. With nature and its living beings?
9. with dangers and crisis management?
10. Is the population structure reflected in the parliaments?
11. Are the freedom of decision-making of the media and the judiciary publicly monitored?
12. Are there any visions for the future?
If there are predominantly negative evaluations in the 12 evaluation points, such social systems have not been able to survive in the course of human history.